WigtuneStudio_banner12x1.5_96dpi_grey-2_small.jpg (40828 bytes)

Kingdom_of_ Babylon_thumnail_small.jpg (54838 bytes)

Tags: President Clinton, Barack Obama, hope and change, Great Uniter, Great Recession, stimulus package, BP Oil Spill, deep water offshore drilling, Judge Feldman, New World Order, Ronald Reagan, Joe the Plumber, share the wealth, spead the wealth around, General Motors, nationalize banks, Obamacare, Health Care Nuclear Option, Czars, Judge Vinson, Patriot Act, Defense of Marriage Act, homosexual marriage, The National Defense Authorization Act, using military on US Citizens, Judge Andrew Napolitano, drones spying on Americans, Martin Luther King, Communism, Karl Marx, Communist Maifesto, Babylon

The Economy of Babylon

Obama's election coincided with the worst free wall of the Stock Market in American history. Yet during the years of George W. Bush, who likewise had to fight off a recession early in his tenure due the President Clinton's fiscal policies and the stock market crash following 911, the unemployment rate bottomed out at 4.4% in the spring of 2007. When Obama took office the unemployment rate that he inherited from Bush stood at 7.8%. Obama's "Change" apparently made it worse as the unemployment rate spiraled up from there. At the high point, the unemployment rate during Obama's presidency was a whopping 10%. As detailed in the Westmore Times on March 22, 2012: "Unfortunately, a large part of the decline since the 10.0% peak reached earlier in his term is the result of people who have given up looking for work. In fact, the percentage of working-age Americans currently unemployed stands at 36.3%, the highest rate of his administration and the worst since the 1980s."

According to Columnist Peter Ferrara as posted on May 32, 2012: "This latest recession started in December, 2007. Since the Great Depression 75 years ago, recessions in America have lasted an average of 10 months, with the longest previously lasting 16 months, not counting this latest spooky downturn.

"The National Bureau of Economic Research, the recognized scorekeeper of when recessions start and end, declared this latest recession over in June, 2009, which would make it the longest recession since the Great Depression. But the historical precedent in America is the deeper the recession the stronger the recovery, as the American economy accelerates to return to its long term trendline. Based on that precedent, we should be in the third year of a raging recovery boom by now. But instead we have suffered the worst economic recovery from a recession since the Great Depression.

"Unemployment actually rose after June, 2009, and did not fall back down below that level until 18 months later in December, 2010. Instead of a recovery, America has suffered the longest period of unemployment above 8% since the Great Depression, under President Obama's public policy malpractice."

The fact is that, other than in election years, Obama desired the high unemployment rate because it increased the welfare state. This was why he continued to fight to extend Federal Unemployment Benefits which continued to keep people dependent upon the government rather than working. With that in mind Chad Stafko wrote on 9-12-11, "We have seen under this president an expanding number of citizens who are partially or wholly dependent on the government for their very livelihood, as the data show that the U.S. has become an ever-growing welfare state under Obama.

"Government dependence, which is defined as the percentage of persons receiving one or more federal benefit payments, is at a staggering 47%, its highest level in American history, while 21 million households are reliant on food stamps. In fact, government spending on food stamps in 2010 ($68 billion) was double what it was in 2007. . ."

It's no wonder that the "Great Recession" lingered. Obama went as far as to do things to hurt the economy including putting a moratorium on deep well drilling in the Gulf after a BP oil spill and refusing to allow the building of the Keystone Pipeline.

As detailed by Jill Adams of the National Review on June 8, 2011, "For months, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar used the Deepwater Horizon tragedy as the single excuse for his agency’s failure to issue permits for new oil exploration in the Gulf. But a new House Oversight and Government Reform Committee report tells a different story: It’s all about political will.

"Ignoring key evidence and input from hundreds of energy-exploration experts, Salazar suspended drilling on 33 deepwater wells and banned new drilling plans in the Gulf of Mexico. He claimed that the moratorium had the backing of a panel of experts that the Obama administration had put together — but the House committee’s report points to an 'important White House official [who] changed the safety report [and] created the misleading appearance of scientific peer review.'

"The committee’s report also noted the administration’s reckless disregard for the 400,000 Gulf Coast workers either directly or indirectly employed by the oil and gas industry. Under Secretary of Commerce Rebecca Blank testified that the administration never once studied the economic impact the moratorium would have on the Gulf Coast economy and on oil production."

". . . The administration’s de facto moratorium on oil exploration in the Gulf has resulted in a complete reversal from where we were one year ago: Domestic production was then at an all-time high for the sixth year in a row; U.S. reliance on the Middle East was decreasing as oil imports from the region declined to less than 18 percent; and Americans were paying $2.86 per gallon.

While watching gas prices go up over $4.00 a gallon Adams continued, "The Obama-Salazar 'let them drive hybrids' mentality is indicative of the disconnect between the White House and the public. There are 250 million cars in this country that don’t run on electricity from solar or wind; they run on oil. And because this president won’t let us drill for oil in the Gulf, there’s less of it — and American drivers are paying the price at the pump.

"Safety is no longer an issue. Oil-rig operators have already demonstrated that they can contain a BP-sized blowout. Yet the administration has issued just one permit to drill in the Gulf of Mexico in the last 12 months. And one year later, the Interior Department is still mulling applications to resume previously approved, previously permitted, and previously drilled wells."

". . .If the president truly wants to cut our dependence on foreign oil, reduce gas prices, and create jobs, he could direct Interior Secretary Salazar to clear the backlog of oil-exploration permit applications in the Gulf and expedite plans going forward.

"But the president doesn’t want that. And that’s the point."

According to the New York Times on 6-22-10, "In a 22-page opinion, the judge, Martin L. C. Feldman of United States District Court, issued a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of a late May order halting all offshore exploratory drilling in more than 500 feet of water.

"Citing potential economic harm to businesses and workers, Judge Feldman wrote that the Obama administration had failed to justify the need for such 'a blanket, generic, indeed punitive, moratorium” on deep-water oil and gas drilling.

“'The blanket moratorium, with no parameters, seems to assume that because one rig failed and although no one yet fully knows why, all companies and rigs drilling new wells over 500 feet also universally present an imminent danger,' wrote Judge Feldman, a 1983 appointee of President Ronald Reagan."

Yet to demonstrate his contempt for the rule of law, after Judge Feldman ordered the Administration to put a halt to the moratorium on deep well drilling in the Gulf, Obama stepped over the constitutional line and ignored the judge.

These moves not only denied Americans jobs when they were desperately needed, but stood in the way of independence from Mideast Oil. Thus Obama's actions were direct assaults on our national security.

It was obvious that it was Obama's intent to use the recession and environmentalism to destroy America's system of capitalism. He sought to create a whole New World Order.


The Government of Babylon

Obama showed his communist stripes in October during the 2008 election. That is when he spoke to Samuel Joseph Wurzelbacher (Joe the Plumber), of suburban Toledo, Ohio. Joe was complaining how tax hikes would penalize him for growing his plumbing business . . . otherwise being punished for success because Obama was intending to raise taxes for higher incomes. Obama responded "I do believe that for folks like me who are, you know, have worked hard but frankly also been lucky, um, I don't mind paying just a little bit more than the waitress who I just met over there whose, things are slow and she can barely make the rent . . . I think when you spread the wealth around it's good for everybody." Otherwise, according to Obama's version of social justice those who are making more should pay more in taxes to support those who are making less. This is pure class warfare founded upon Communism.

Throughout his presidency Obama made sure to keep class warfare alive. And so, according to Lartry Kudlow of the National Review on 2-13-12 soon after his State of the Union speech, "If you shake out the Obama budget in terms of bold headlines, it’s really a class-warfare, tax-the-rich budget. Layer upon layer of tax hikes are piled on successful investors, small-business owners, and corporations."

Charles Gasper of the New York Post agreed on 1-26-12: "Three years after the Hope and Change president took office, Hope turns out to mean high taxes and lots of regulations, and Change consists of celebrating the government’s takeover of General Motors and belittling technological progress that destroys some jobs even as it creates others. The Great Uniter is all about class warfare.

"Such was President Obama’s latest State of the Union Address."

Indeed Obama used the unfortunate economy to nationalize private businesses, including General Motors; in order to extend the reach of government farther than it has ever gone before. According to the Washington Post on April 28, 2009, "The partial nationalization proposal (was) a last-ditch effort developed by GM and the Obama administration's auto task force to keep the leading U.S. carmaker out of bankruptcy". Early in 2009 Obama attempted a backdoor enterprise to nationalize banks through "equity conversion." The supposed idea was to save banks that would not have the available capital to ride out future credit loses by shifting money around. According to the Wall Street Journal on April 21, 2009: ". . . wholesale equity conversion would mean the government owns a larger share of more banks and is more entangled than ever in their operations. Giving Barney Frank more voting power is more likely to induce panic than restore confidence. Simply look at the reluctance of some banks -- notably J.P. Morgan Chase -- to participate in Mr. Geithner's private-public toxic asset sale plan. The plan is rigged so taxpayers assume nearly all the downside risk, but the banks still don't want to play lest Congress they become even more subject to political whim."

During the early years of his presidency a vast majority of America was opposed to health care reform. Nonetheless Obama went directly against the will of the people to do what Clinton failed to do. He ramrodded a health care bill through a weak Senate for the express purpose of destroying the entire health insurance industry and nationalizing that part of the economy. The bill was slated to insure health insurance for 95% of the population. Therefore, 95% of the American people would be directly dependent upon the federal government under his plan and thus controlled by the US government as well.

According to the Guardian on 3-22-10; "Barack Obama last night forced his bitterly fought healthcare reform bill through Congress, bringing near-universal coverage to Americans and delivering the first major triumph of his presidency.

"After days of maneuvering by the Democratic party leadership to bring dissident party legislators on board and an impassioned plea on Saturday by Obama, the speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, confirmed that the votes were in the bag.

"'Tonight, at a time when the pundits said it was no longer possible, we rose above the weight of our politics," Obama said during a late-night appearance at the White House.

"'This legislation will not fix everything that ails our healthcare system, but it moves us decisively in the right direction. This is what change looks like.'"

"Despite not going as far as many liberals had hoped, the bill will take the US close to universal healthcare coverage and Obama will have achieved the goal that eluded US presidents dating back to Theodore Roosevelt a century ago."

Indeed Obama "forced" the healthcare law through Congress. When the Democrats in the Senate didn't have enough votes to overcome a Republican filibuster, it appeared that the health care law was dead in the water. But then there was the so-called "nuclear option."

As indicated by Brian Darling of the Heritage Foundry on February 24, 2010, "The President’s new version of Obamacare, and his method of passing it, are not popular with the American people. Dubbed the Health Care Nuclear Option, this tactic will only further anger the American by sidetracking the filibuster in the Senate and creating an even more highly charged partisan atmosphere in Congress. The content of Obamacare, and the strategies being employed to pass it, violates one of our nation’s core first principles: the consent of the governed. Our Republic is not a democracy where bare 51 vote majorities rule. Throughout our nation’s history most major legislative changes in Washington have historically been bipartisan and President Obama’s effort clearly falls short of that tradition.

". . . Americans treasure the idea that our Republic was set up so that the power of the federal government is derived from the consent of the people. The extraordinary state power to pass legislation that puts the government in control of more private health care decisions should only be done with the clear consent of the American people.

". . . There is no consent of the governed for Obamacare. As a matter of fact, there is a consensus that the President’s top down approach to reforming health care has the explicit opposition of the American people."

But the consent of the people was not on Obama's mind. Rather, it was intention use the health care law to bring the American populace under his direct control. To make sure of that, he built the law around an unconstitutional mandate that forces everyone in America to purchase health insurance. If that were to stand, then the precedence would be set for the government to force people to buy what it wants them to buy. It sounds a lot like the circumstances surrounding the Mark of the Beast to me.

And he causeth all, the small and the great, and the rich and the poor, and the free and the bond, that there be given them a mark on their right hand, or upon their forehead; and that no man should be able to buy or to sell, save he that hath the mark, [even] the name of the beast or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. He that hath understanding, let him count the number of the beast; for it is the number of a man: and his number is Six hundred and sixty and six. (Rev 13: 16-18)

Also, Obama knew if the government can control people's health, then it can control them. In order to kick off the Communist movement in America, the Communist's first president, Franklin Roosevelt, initiated Social Security. Then another Communist, Lyndon Johnson got his New Society off the ground and instituted Medicare. But nationalizing the entire health care industry was the dream of Communist America since the Roosevelt's New Deal. Obama accomplished that.

In addition Obama expanded his powers by taking the appointment of Czars to a new level. While sidestepping the approval Congress he appointed a host of powerful men and women bent on controlling the actions of Americans. "As of July 20, 2009," wrote Glenn Beck, "The Brainroom counts 32 czars in the Obama administration, based on media reports from reputable sources that have identified the official in question as a czar. In addition, President Obama has said that he will create the position of cyber czar, and there have been media reports that there could be a health insurance czar and a copyright czar. When and if those positions are filled, that would bring the total to 35."

Every one of these Czars was appointed without congressional approval. As observed by Mike Bauer on 5-16-11; "Since his election as President, Barack Obama has appointed approximately three-dozen so-called 'czars' to manage various governmental responsibilities. These czars have been described as 'super aides' who work across agency lines to push the President’s agenda. CBS News says they 'report directly to Mr. Obama and have the power to shape national policy on their subject area.' The lines defining the boundaries of the czars’ power are unclear, however, even to many in Congress.

"In most cases there are no confirmation hearings to evaluate the qualifications of the appointed czars, thus they are largely insulated from accountability to Congress. Critics say that such an arrangement threatens to increase the power of the President (who appoints these czars) beyond what is constitutionally mandated. Even the late Democrat Senator Robert Byrd warned that the czar system 'can threaten the constitutional system of checks and balances.'”

These Czars were affiliated with ultra left wing activist groups (otherwise Communists). Likewise they were Obama donors.

It was obvious that it was Obama's intention to undermine the authority of Congress in order to transform it into a gathering of puppets. As I sit here on June 1, 2012 I see that the approval rating of Congress, according to Fox News, stands at a meager 14.6%. This is a shell of the former 58% ratings that Congress got while Newt Gingrigh was ramming through his "Contract With America." Yet, in spite of the fact that Obama had totally botch economic recovery his approval rating still hangs in there at 47.4 %. It amazed me that Obama has an approval rating at all until I realized that America may be making the same determinations as those citizens of ancient Rome. That the beast has become too big for the Republic to effectively govern.

Therefore, in order to weaken Congress Obama went on the attack with his usual gridlock mantra. According to Fox News on January 28, 2012, “President Obama, fresh from a five-state tour following his State of the Union address, is calling for government reforms to ease gridlock and bar members of Congress from profiting from their position.

“. . . The president reiterated his calls for government reform made in Tuesday's address, saying he wants the Senate to pass a rule that requires a yes-or-no vote for judicial and public service nominations after 90 days. Many of the nominees, he said, carry bipartisan support but get held up in Congress for political reasons.

“. . . Obama said he also wants Congress to pass legislation to ban insider trading by lawmakers and prohibit lawmakers from owning securities in companies that have business before their committees.

“In addition, the president is seeking to prohibit people who ’bundle’ campaign contributions from other donors for members of Congress from lobbying Congress. Obama urged the public to contact their member of Congress and tell them ‘that it's time to end the gridlock and start tackling the issues that really matter.’"

This was nothing other than the arm of Octavian demanding that the Senate do his bidding. Like Caesar himself Obama was demanding that Congress pass rules to limit its ability to make independent decisions. As his comments clearly testified he wanted the Senate rules to be rigged so that he could ramrod his liberal judges and programs through. He wanted to control what legislators could invest in and limit the money they could raise to attain office. What would he want next? President for life?

There could be no doubt that Obama desired to attain the status of Caesar. Therefore he expanded the role of the presidency into a dictatorship when he ignored the rulings of judges and the laws of Congress. We have already described how he ignored a judge's order regarding his Gulf deep well drilling moratorium. Then, as posted by William A. Jacobson, Associate Clinical Professor Cornell Law School, on January 31, 2011, "Federal Judge Roger Vinson of the Northern District of Florida, in a lawsuit by 26 state attorney generals, has held that Obamacare is unconstitutional. Judge Vinson first found that the mandate was unconstitutional, and then found that the mandate could not be severed from the rest of the law, requiring that the entire law be deemed unconstitutional.

"Judge Vinson found that there was no need for an injunction, since the declaratory judgment that the entire law was invalid was sufficient. In effect, there is nothing left to enjoin, since no part of the law survived."

In other words, the judge's ruling assured that Obamacare must not be implemented until the appeal process had taken the matter to the Supreme Court. Obama simply ignored the judge's ruling and implemented his coveted law anyway.

Then Obama defied Congress when he refused to enforce the Defense of Marriage Act. As it turned out, in spite of his professions during the 2008 campaign, as revealed during the campaign of 2012 on May 9, 2012, Obama was actually in favor of homosexual marriage. So, to Obama, when the law went against his personal Communist agenda, he would simply ignore it.

On March 16, 2012 it was revealed that Obama was taking the Patriot Act to new levels. According to the New York Times "For more than two years, a handful of Democrats on the Senate intelligence committee have warned that the government is secretly interpreting its surveillance powers under the Patriot Act in a way that would be alarming if the public — or even others in Congress — knew about it.

"On Thursday, two of those senators —Ron Wyden of Oregon and Mark Udall of Colorado — went further. They said a top-secret intelligence operation that is based on that secret legal theory is not as crucial to national security as executive branch officials have maintained."

The Oval added; "'As we see it, there is now a significant gap between what most Americans think the law allows and what the government secretly claim the law allows,' said a letter to the Justice Department by Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., and Mark Udall, D-Colo."

But perhaps the most frightening development of all was the fact that Obama determined he would use the military against US citizens. As reported in Forbes on January 2, 2012, "The National Defense Authorization Act greatly expands the power and scope of the federal government to fight the War on Terror, including codifying into law the indefinite detention of terrorism suspects without trial. Under the new law the US military has the power to carry out domestic anti-terrorism operations on US soil.

"'The fact that I support this bill as a whole does not mean I agree with everything in it,' the president said in a statement.'I have signed this bill despite having serious reservations with certain provisions that regulate the detention, interrogation and prosecution of suspected terrorists.'

"Worse, the NDAA authorizes the military to detain even US citizens under the broad new anti-terrorism provisions provided in the bill, once again without trial.

"There is some controversy on this point, in part because the law as written is entirely too vague. But whether or not the law will be used to indefinitely detain US citizens domestically, it is written to allow the detention of US citizens abroad as well as foreigners without trial.

“'Obama’s signing statement seems to suggest he already believes he has the authority to indefinitely detain Americans—he just never intends to use it,' Adam Serwer writes at Mother Jones."

Yea, right.

And worse yet, during the first week of June, 2012, Judge Andrew P. Napolitano of Fox News began to report of the Obama Administrations intent of using drones (un-manned aircraft) for the purpose of spying on American citizens. In his article Where is the Outrage? He penned on June 7, 2012, "The photos that the drones will take may be retained and used or even distributed to others in the government so long as the "recipient is reasonably perceived to have a specific, lawful governmental function” in requiring them. And for the first time since the Civil War, the federal government will deploy military personnel inside the United States and publicly acknowledge that it is deploying them 'to collect information about U.S. persons.'

"It gets worse. If the military personnel see something of interest from a drone, they may apply to a military judge or 'military commander' for permission to conduct a physical search of the private property that intrigues them. And, any 'incidentally acquired information' can be retained or turned over to local law enforcement. What's next? Prosecutions before military tribunals in the U.S.?

"The quoted phrases above are extracted from a now-public 30-page memorandum issued by President Obama's Secretary of the Air Force on April 23, 2012. The purpose of the memorandum is stated as 'balancing … obtaining intelligence information. . . and protecting individual rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. . .' Note the primacy of intelligence gathering over freedom protection, and note the peculiar use of the word 'balancing.'

"When liberty and safety clash, do we really expect the government to balance those values? Of course not. The government cannot be trusted to restrain itself in the face of individual choices to pursue happiness. That's why we have a Constitution and a life-tenured judiciary: to protect the minority from the liberty-stealing impulses of the majority. And that's why the Air Force memo has its priorities reversed -- intelligence gathering first, protecting freedom second -- and the mechanism of reconciling the two -- balancing them -- constitutionally incorrect. . . .

"The Judeo-Christian and constitutionally mandated relationship between government power and individual liberty is not balance. It is bias -- a bias in favor of liberty. All presumptions should favor the natural rights of individuals, not the delegated and seized powers of the government. Individual liberty, not government power, is the default position because persons are immortal and created in God's image, and governments are temporary and based on force.

"Hence my outrage at the coming use of drones -- some as small as golf balls -- to watch us, to listen to us and to record us. Did you consent to the government having that power? Did you consent to the American military spying on Americans in America? I don't know a single person who has, but I know only a few who are complaining.

"If we remain silent when our popularly elected government violates the laws it has sworn to uphold and steals the freedoms we elected it to protect, we will have only ourselves to blame when Big Brother is everywhere. Somehow, I doubt my father's generation fought the Nazis in World War II only to permit a totalitarian government to flourish here.

"Is President Obama prepared to defend this? Is Gov. Romney prepared to challenge it? Are you prepared for its consequences?"


* * *

Communism is the religion of the antichrist. As detailed by the Reverend Martin Luther King, "First, Communism is based on a materialistic and humanistic view of life and history. According to Communist theory, matter, not mind or spirit, speaks the last word in the universe. Such a philosophy is avowedly secularistic and atheistic. Under it, God is merely a figment of the imagination, religion is a product of fear and ignorance, and the church is an invention of the rulers to control the masses. Moreover, Communism, like humanism, thrives on the grand illusion that man, unaided by any divine power, can save himself and usher in a new society--

"Cold atheism wrapped in the garments of materialism, Communism provides no place for God or Christ.

"At the center of the Christian faith is the affirmation that there is a God in the universe who is the ground and essence of all reality. A Being of infinite love and boundless power, God is the creator, sustainer, and conserver of values. In opposition to Communism's atheistic materialism, Christianity posits a theistic idealism. Reality cannot be explained by matter in motion or the push and pull of economic forces. Christianity affirms that at the heart of reality is a Heart, a loving Father who works through history for the salvation of his children. Man cannot save himself, for man is not the measure of all things and humanity is not God. Bound by the chains of his own sin and finiteness, man needs a Savior.

"Second, Communism is based on ethical relativism and accepts no stable moral absolutes. Right and wrong are relative to the most expedient methods for dealing with class war. Communism exploits the dreadful philosophy that the end justifies the means. It enunciates movingly the theory of a classless society, but alas! Its methods for achieving this noble end are all too often ignoble. Lying, violence, murder, and torture are considered to be justifiable means to achieve the millennial end. Is this an unfair indictment? Listen to the words of Lenin, the real tactician of Communist theory: 'We must be ready to employ trickery, deceit, lawbreaking, withholding and concealing truth.' Modem history has known many tortuous nights and horror-filled days because his followers have taken this statement seriously.

"In contrast to the ethical relativism of Communism, Christianity sets forth a system of absolute moral values and affirms that God has placed within the very structure of this universe certain moral principles that are fixed and immutable. The law of love as an imperative is the norm for all of man's actions. Furthermore, Christianity at its best refuses to live by a philosophy of ends justifying means. Destructive means cannot bring constructive ends, because the means represent the-ideal-in-the-making and the-end-in-progress. Immoral means cannot bring moral ends, for the ends are preexistent in the means.

"Third, Communism attributes ultimate value to the state. Man is made for the state and not the state for man. One may object, saying that in Communist theory the state is an 'interim reality,' which will 'wither away' when the classless society emerges. True--in theory; but it is also true that, while it lasts, the state is the end. Man is a means to that end. Man has no inalienable rights. His only rights are derived from, and conferred by, the state. Under such a system, the fountain of freedom runs dry. Restricted are man's liberties of press and assembly, his freedom to vote, and his freedom to listen and to read. Art, religion, education, music, and science come under the gripping yoke of government control. Man must be a dutiful servant to the omnipotent state.

"All of this is contrary, not only to the Christian doctrine of God, but also to the Christian estimate of man. Christianity insists that man is an end because he is a child of God, made in God's image. Man is more than a producing animal guided by economic forces; he is a being of spirit, crowned with glory and honor, endowed with the gift of freedom. The ultimate weakness of Communism is that it robs man of that quality which makes him man. Man, says Paul Tillich, is man because he is free. This freedom is expressed through man's capacity to deliberate, decide, and respond. Under Communism, the individual soul is shackled by the chains of conformity; his spirit is bound by the manacles of party allegiance. He is stripped of both conscience and reason. The trouble with Communism is that it has neither a theology nor a Christology; therefore it emerges with a mixed-up anthropology. Confused about God, it is also confused about man. In spite of its glowing talk about the welfare of the masses, Communism's methods and philosophy strip man of his dignity and worth, leaving him as little more than a depersonalized cog in the ever-turning wheel of the state.

"Clearly, then, all of this is out of harmony with the Christian view of things. We must not fool ourselves. These systems of thought are too contradictory to be reconciled; they represent diametrically opposed ways of looking at the world and of transforming it."

In order to usurp the Christian teaching of Heaven, Communism seeks to create a Utopian society here on earth. This is worldwide system of no morality, no families, no classes and no rules. This is the "heaven" of the Communist system. Thus King proclaimed: "The theory, though surely not the practice, of Communism challenges us to be more concerned about social justice. With all of its false assumptions and evil methods, Communism arose as a protest against the injustices and indignities inflicted upon the underprivileged. The Communist Manifesto was written by men aflame with a passion for social justice. Karl Marx, born of Jewish parents who both came from rabbinic stock, and trained, as he must have been, in the Hebrew Scriptures, could never forget the words of Amos: 'Let judgment roll down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream.' Marx's parents adopted Christianity when he was a child of six, thus adding to the Old Testament heritage that of the New. In spite of his later atheism and antiecclesiasticism, Marx could not quite forget Jesus' concern for 'the least of these.' In his writings, he champions the cause of the poor, the exploited, and the disinherited

"Communism in theory emphasizes a classless society. Although the world knows from sad experience that Communism has created new classes and a new lexicon of injustice, in its theoretical formulation it envisages a world society transcending the superficialities of race and color, class and caste. Membership in the Communist party theoretically is not determined by the color of a man's skin or the quality of blood in his veins."

Communists admit that their false heaven will not be achieved until they have enforced their humanistic creed world wide. Communism was devised as an atheist assault on Christianity for the purpose of destroying it.

Communism under a dictator is the government of the antichrist. Obama had already shown his Communist/dictatorial stripes. All he needed was a second term when he would be no longer accountable to the electorate.


About the Author

Click Here to purchase the E-book edition for only 99 cents!

Back212.gif (3571 bytes)FORWARD212.gif (3319 bytes)

Blog Index


HTML Comment Box is loading comments...

   Empart logo_header.jpg (23053 bytes)



About the Author


Don Wigton is a graduate of the prestigious music department at CSULB where he studied under Frank Pooler, lyricist of Merry Christmas Darling, and sang in Pooler’s world renown University Choir alongside Karen and Richard Carpenter. During this time Don was also the lead composer of the band, Clovis Putney, that won the celebrated Hollywood Battle of the Bands. After giving his life to God, Don began attending Calvary Chapel, Costa Mesa to study under some of the most prominent early Maranatha! musicians. Subsequently he toured the Western United States with Jedidiah in association with Myrrh Records.

Eventually Don served as a pastor at Calvary Chapel Bakersfield to witness thousands of salvations through that ministry. As the music/concert director, Don worked for seven years with most major Christian artist of that time while producing evangelical concerts attended by thousands of young people seeking after God. Don’s Calvary Chapel Praise Choir released the album Let All Who Hath Breath Praise the Lord on the Maranatha! label.

The next years of Don’s life were spent as the praise leader of First Baptist Church in Bakersfield during a time of unprecedented church renewal. Don teamed with the leadership to successfully meld the old with the new through a period of tremendous church growth. During this exciting time, Don’s praise team, Selah, produced the CD Stop and Think About It.

Today Don is the leading force behind Wigtune Company. This webbased project located at www.praisesong.net has provided several million downloads of Don’s music and hymn arrangements to tens of thousands of Christian organizations throughout the world. More music can be found at Don's Southern Cross Band website at www.socrossband.com.

The book Holy Wars represents Don’s most recent effort to bless the church with biblical instruction and direction in praise and worship. This heartfelt volume is an offering not only to God’s people, but also to God Himself.


Connect With Don Online

Facebook - Southern Cross Band

Facebook - Wigtune Company

Wigtune Blog



down arrow Check out this powerful Southern Cross song! down arrow


Empart - Click here to find out about the price that is being paid by those in Northern India and Nepal who have dedicated their lives to worship the Lord. Find out how you can be involved!An Incredible revival is occuring in Northern India and Nepal. CLICK HERE to find out more!

More Wigtune Blogs

A_House_Divided_thumnail_small.jpg (50639 bytes)


The Breath of Babylon_thumbnail.jpg (56275 bytes)

The Mind of Babylon_thumbnail.jpg (53483 bytes)

The Children of Babylon_thumbnail.jpg (58992 bytes)

Holy_Wars_thumnail.jpg (57681 bytes)


Kingdom of Babylon-small.jpg (84465 bytes)

This second of five books looks into a pivotal moment in American history that corrupted her soul. It was a time when the United States was coming off an era of prosperity created by the sound economic policies, patriotism and faith of Ronald Reagan. However, during the '90s a president without scruples took the reigns of a house united and tore it asunder. As a result we live in a divided America on the brink of judgment.

Click Here to purchase the E-book edition for only 99 cents!





The gospel band Southern Cross features worship, praise chorus and ministry songs in contemporary rock, country rock and even classic genres. Click here to go to their page to listen to our mp3 music and find out how to have them come to your area!

All For Freedom!

Thanks to the men and women who give their all for our freedom.


Father's Eyes

A nation in apostacy


Uh Uh Uh

There are many lying voices out in the world calling us to sin and despair.


You Broke My Heart

Jesus said "Let your yes be yes and your no's be no's." When we break our word people get hurt.



Wigtune Company

An offering of psalms, hymns and spiritual songs for the worship edification of the Body of Christ.
Colossians 3:15-17

Praise and Worship Songs to bless God. . .

Free Praise Music, Charts Song and Hymn Stories  

Top Ten Praise MP3s

Contemporary Worship and Praise Music Archive

Latest  Contemporary Praise and Worship Music Releases

Traditional Hymn Music

Christmas Praise Music

Easter Worship Music

Patriotic Praise Hymns (American)

Instrumental Worship Music

Praise Music For Worship Devotions

Contemporary Christian Ministry Songs

Free On-Line Praise and Worship Studybook  

Listen to Wigtune Worshim Music on live Internet radio

Wigtune Contemporary Worship, Praise and Hymn CD's

Karaoke (Accompanyment Tracks for your favorite Wigtunes)


Vision Statement

Wigtune Story 

Copyright Restrictions

Contact Us

Spread the Word!

Bible Study Helps, a Multitude of Christian Links and Other Goodies

Where's Wiggy? - List and Links to Christian Organizations

Statement of Faith

Special Report: Christianity in Russia - Has Anything Changed?


Holy_Wars_cover_small.jpg (51492 bytes)Holy Wars. . .a powerful and dynamic "must have" for every Christian who is seeking to worship God in the midst of the tempest of our modern world.

CLICK HERE or call Author House @ 888.280.7715 to purchase a hard or soft cover copy of Don Wigton's book "Holy Wars" upon which this blog is based.

Click Here to purchase the E-book edition for only 99 cents!




   Empart logo_header.jpg (23053 bytes)


Wigtune Company: Praise music and worship study resource.  Free Christian praise songs and hymns, chord charts for the contemporary chorus and traditonal hymn and gospel music, plus and on-line worship Bible study.

Click here for the Wigtune worship, praise and hymns Facebook page.

Millions of
Wigtune MP3


Pastors, worship music ministers, small group leaders, praise bands and members of over
3337 ministries from 94 countries world-wide including all 50 states in the United States
are now using Wigtune praise and worship resources.

We pray that these materials have provided all of you with untold blessings!

"I might not be a religious man myself but I know good music when I hear it, and this is very good! . . . I don’t think that I have ever given such high ratings to so many songs before. But the fact is that they are well deserved because the music is amazing. Simply wonderful religious ballads and they really get to your heart. . .everytime."
Fredrik Cole: Trax In Space



Winsome International was founded by Dr. John Lavender of First Baptist Church, Bakersfield. Don Wigton of Wigtune Company was the worship and praise leader there during a great growth expansion. Click here to hear the teaching that inspired so many.




Musicl 1.gif (414 bytes)


Wigtune Company offers free mp3 Jesus based praise music and song along with traditional Christian hymns performed in a contemporary fashion in order to encourage the body of Christ to blend the old with the new in a scriptural fashion.  An on-line Bible study is offered that goes into the biblical and historical foundation of worship for music ministries, the music minister, praise leader, pastor and serious Bible student.  The study is presented in outline form with relevant scripture references and questions.  Download this helpful work for free! was formed as a service to the body of Christ to encourage scriptural worship. To accomplish this goal Wigtune Company offers free contemporary Christian praise and worship music, contemporary Christian rock and hymn mp3 and chart material along with a free on-line worship study book for personal devotions, Bible study groups, Sunday schools, pastors, music ministers and ministry training.  In order to bridge the gap between the old and the new the worship study book gives solid theological and historical support to the use of traditional Christian hymn-singing in conjunction with praise chorus singing.

Click on one of the links below for praise and worship, praise tabs, worship chords, praise chorus mp3, hymn stories, pro tools studio, worship leader materials to enter into the area of the Wigtune site that interests you !

Wigtune Company believes that the current contention among Christian generations over church music is unnesessary.  One does not have to chose between the classic traditional hymn and the contemporary praise chorus and song.  Solomon declared that there is a place for everything under the sun. The worship musical material and the worship Bible study book offered at the Wigtune website support this theme. Vision Statement    Don and Vanessa Wigton share the vision of Wigtune Company.  Going to this page will inform the WEB surfer the circumstances that lead to the Wigtune offering of praise song and hymn along with the worship Bible study book that lends theology and history based support to the use of traditional Christian hymn singing in conjunction with praise chorus singing.   Wigtune Story    The Wigtune Company free on-line worship Bible study book is a manual for the use of the pastor, teacher, music minister, Bible study group, sunday school and any situation where a theological and historical lesson regarding worship is desired.  The Bible study is presented in outline form with questions that require thoughtful answers to the biblical and history based information that is presented.   Free On-Line Worship Studybook   

Wigtune Company offers free mp3 praise music in the form of tradtional Christian hymn performed in a contemporary manner and modern praise song and choruses mp3s.  Chord charts to many of these song mp3's are available for non-commercial ministry use.  Free Praise and Worship Music Mp3s and Charts   Wigtune Company offers free mp3 praise music in the form of tradtional Christian hymn performed in a contemporary manner and modern praise song and choruses mp3s.  Chord charts to many of these song mp3's are available for non-commercial ministry use.

Wigtune Company offers free mp3 praise music in the form of tradtional Christian hymn performed in a contemporary manner and modern praise song and choruses mp3s.  Chord charts to many of these song mp3's are available for non-commercial ministry use. Wiggy's Top Ten Praise MP3s Wigtune Company offers free mp3 praise music in the form of tradtional Christian hymn performed in a contemporary manner and modern praise song and choruses mp3s.  Chord charts to many of these song mp3's are available for non-commercial ministry use.

Wigtune Company offers free mp3 praise music in the form of tradtional Christian hymn performed in a contemporary manner and modern praise song and choruses mp3s.  Chord charts to many of these song mp3's are available for non-commercial ministry use. Radio: Listen to Wigtune Worship Music on Live Internet Radio

Wigtune Company offers free mp3 praise music in the form of tradtional Christian hymn performed in a contemporary manner and modern praise song and choruses mp3s.  Chord charts to many of these song mp3's are available for non-commercial ministry use.    Wigtune Praise Worship and Hymn CD's

 What are they saying about Wigtune praise and worship contemporary and hymn music   Testimonials: What they are saying about Wigtune Music

Please help Wigtune Company by observing the copyright restrictions listed on this page.  The praise and worship materials (praise songs and hymns) have been offered up for free with love!  Copyright Restrictions    

What do you think of Wigtune's offering of praise music and worship study materials?  Let us know by e-mailing us?   Contact Us    If you have been blessed by the free praise music (praise choruses and traditional hymns) and the worship study book, don't keep it to yourself.  Click here to see how you can spread the word!   Spread the Word!

Bullet1.gif (1151 bytes)  Bible Study Helps, a Multitude of Christian Links and Other Goodies

Click here to find out what organization are utilizing Wigtune contemporary Christian and traditional praise and worship music, chord charts, and online worship Bible study.  Where's Wiggy? - List and Links to Christian Organizations

  Click here to view the Wigtune statement of faith based upon orthodox Christian beliefs.  It is upon this profession that proclaims the doctrines of historical Christianity that the Wigtune praise and worship music and Bible study have been formulated.  Statement of Faith

Click here to view the Wigtune statement of faith based upon orthodox Christian beliefs.  It is upon this profession that proclaims the doctrines of historical Christianity that the Wigtune praise and worship music and Bible study have been formulated.   Special Report: Christianity in Russia - Has Anything Changed?

 The Wigtune Home Page: Free mp3 praise music and hymns sung in a contemporary fashion.  On-line worship study book for Bible students, music ministers, song leaders and pastors is also available!

This WEB page created by

Wigtune Company Praise and Worship Music Resource Center

Last updated on 07/20/12 This worship site for Christians was created in Front Page


Copyright 1999 Don Wigton. All rights reserved.